A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Patidar, C. P.
- Greenhouse Gas Emission and Soil Properties as Influenced by Wheat Biomass Burning in Vertisols of Central India
Authors
1 Indian Institute of Soil Science, Nabibagh, Berasia Road, Bhopal 462 038, IN
2 Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Nabibagh, Berasia Road, Bhopal 462 038, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 107, No 7 (2014), Pagination: 1150-1154Abstract
Biomass burning is a major contributor to the atmospheric carbon budget and increases the concentration of many trace gases apart from the adverse effects on soil properties. However, in many parts of India, crop residue burning is a recurrent and widespread practice for disposal of the residues after harvest of the previous crop to facilitate sowing of the succeeding crop. The residue burning on a larger scale also leads to severe atmospheric pollution. Against this backdrop, the present work was conducted to study the effect of wheat (Triticum aestivum) residue burning on soil properties and assess the potential greenhouse gas emission from burning of such residues on a regional scale. The study was taken up on farmers' field in Bhopal district, Madhya Pradesh, with two residue disposal methods, viz. residue burning and residue removal, for comparison with respect to their effect on soil properties and the greenhouse gas emission potential. No significant difference was observed between both methods in terms of soil organic carbon, inorganic carbon and available P content at 0-15 and 15-30 cm soil depths. Though residue burning showed favourable effect on available K content, there was reduction in the available N content in the 15-30 cm soil depth. Residue burning did not show significant effect on soil biological activity as estimated from fluorescence diacetate test. On the other hand, there was a significant adverse effect on soil structure and labile carbon content. Residue burning was estimated to result in the emission of 379 Gg C equivalent for India and 14 Gg C equivalent for MP.Keywords
Biomass Burning, Greenhouse Gas Emission, Soil Properties, Wheat.- An Automated Testing Model Using Test Driven Development Approach
Authors
1 IT Department, IET-DAVV, Indore (M.P.), IN
2 Computer Engineering, IET-DAVV, Indore (M.P.), IN
Source
Oriental Journal of Computer Science and Technology, Vol 10, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 385-390Abstract
Today we live in the era of software and web applications. Software is used in every minor and major field. In defense, medical, education, research, government, administration and much other field software became a necessary part. Software also brings transparency in the systems. Software also makes people's life easy and comfortable. Software testing is a very important part of any software development process. Software testing requires approximately forty percent budget of any software development process. Like in an automobile industry every vehicle is tested before it goes to the customer. Also in software testing it is must to test the software before deployment. Because if software deployed without testing then user will face the bug and user will be unhappy with the software. In this paper we compare manual and automated testing and proposed an automated testing model with test driven development (TDD).
Keywords
Software Testing, Test Driven Development (TDD) Framework, Test Plan, Test Case, Application Under Test (AUT).References
- Yogesh Singh “Software Testing”, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-107- 01269-7, First edition 2012.
- Vivek Kumar “Comparison of Manual and Automation Testing”, International Journal of Research in Science and Technology (IJRST) 2012, Vol. No. 1, Issue No. V, Apr-Jun ISSN: 2249-0604.
- Kent Beck, “Extreme Programming Explained ; Embrace change”, Addison-Wesley, second (2nd) edition, 1999.
- Flowchart of TDD process, http://agiledata.org/essays/tdd.html, 20 August 2016.
- Karhu, Katja, et al. “Empirical observations on software testing automation”, Software Testing Verification and Validation, 2009. ICST’09. International Conference on. IEEE, 2009.
- Auri M. R. Vincenzi, Tiago Bachiga, Daniel G.de Oliveira, et al. Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Automating Test Case Design, Selection, and Evaluation. FSE (Foundation of Software Engineering) Conference, ACM New York, NY, USA, 2016
- Gerardo Canfora, AnielloCimitile, Felix Garcia et al. “Evaluating Advantages of TestDriven Development:aControlled Experiment with Professionals”, International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE’06), ACM , September 21-22, 2006.
- Fei Wang and Wencai Du et al. “A Test Automation Framework Based on WEB”,ACIS 11thInternational Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), IEEE , 2012.
- Categories of automated testing tools, http://www.testingtools.com/test-automation/, 9 September 2016.
- SELENIUM FRAMWORK, http://www.seleniumhq.org/docs/01_introducing_selenium.jsp, 15 September 2016.
- Volume 3, No. 12, December 2012 Journal of Global Research in Computer Science RESEARCH PAPER Available Online at www.jgrcs.info © JGRCS 2010, All Rights Reserved 36 STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF AUTOMATION TESTING TECHNIQUES 12. SAHI Tool, http://sahipro.com/, 25 September 2016.
- Watir Tool, https://watir.com/, 29 September 2016.
- TestComplete Tool, https://smartbear.com/product/testcomplete/overview/, 6 November 2016.
- Squish Tool, https://www.froglogic.com/squish/, 10 November 2016.
- JUnit Tool, http://junit.org/junit4/, 17 November 2016
- NUnit Tool, http://www.nunit.org/, 22 November 2016.
- PHPUnit Tool, https://phpunit.de/, 28 November 2016.
- Apache Jmeter Tool, http://jmeter.apache.org/, 7 December 2016.
- LoadUI Tool, https://smartbear.com/product/ready api/loadui/overview/, 12 December 2016.